Exam Prep Blog
Sunday, 1 March 2015
Tuesday, 24 February 2015
Creative Decisions made during post-production
Describe
a range of creative decisions that you made in post-production and how these
decisions made a difference to the final outcomes (50)
Post–production is perhaps the stage where
it easiest to produce an array of creative outcomes. For example, in my
thriller opening (AS Portfolio) entitled “Water’s Edge” and my music video (A2
Portfolio) for the song “Monkey Gone to Heaven” by “Pixies”, programs such as
After Effects and Final Cut X enabled me to enliven creative ideas that I would
not have been able to do in the production/filming stage.
I created my thriller using Final Cut Pro X. Whilst Final Cut offers a
whole range of editing possibilities, it is not properly suited for was the use
of green screen. Consequently, I had to make changes to my initial storyboard.
One such change was a scene, where I had intended a girl to be standing at
train station on a platform, for a train to pass her and have her disappear or
alternatively transform into a lifeless version of herself. This would have
ideally been created with a green screen. However, upon becoming fluent in the
use of After Effects I was able to create more of my final product this year
(the music video) in post- production. I used a green screen and through keying
out the green and replacing it with moving backdrops and 3d images to give
depth, I would say that this has allowed me to express myself more creatively.
In this respect, I was actually able to do a lot more with less footage and
surprisingly in comparison to last year I used less footage, as I was able to
do more with less.
Lighting is integral to producing a film product of reputable quality.
For my thriller there is a shot of a murdered girl floating underwater in a
lake. The actual shot was filmed in a swimming pool with a GoPro Hero HD, with
ample lighting that resulted in the ‘blue’ of the swimming pool being very
apparent. This made it very hard to give credibility to the idea that this
supposed victim had drowned in a murky lake. In post-production, I was able to
rectify this through colour correction. Through adjusting the hues and applying
a filter I was able to simulate dirty swamp like water, which amplified the scene
both in terms of the emotive response it evoked and its meaning. Similarly, I
decided to emulate this technique of effectively altering the lighting to
achieve a different final outcome for my music video. In order to create depth
and place focus on my performer, I darkened the entire shot in After Effects
and used an artificial light in the program to create a spotlight type effect,
so that I control where my audience would look.
Another creative decision I made in post-production was the use of sound
effects to add another dimension to the final piece. The scene depicted a man
murdering a much younger female, but where and when the scene was happening was
a little unclear. It wasn’t perspicuous whether the scene was a flashback or
the audience was just being shown the murder. I wanted to make coherent the
fact that the scene was occurring in the protagonist’s mind. I achieved this
through sound work. The scene was filmed using a sequence of short scenes, with
quick cuts. Upon each cut, I placed a ‘scratch’ type sound that alluded to the
idea, that what was being shown on screen was being experienced as a memory.
This is a prime example of how a creative decision made in post-production
changed the meaning of my work and made it feel more original. Sound work was
equally as important for my music video, as my opening shot features
non-diegetic sound to firmly establish and distinguish the narrative from the
performance element of my music video.
In
conclusion, decisions I have made in post-production have altered the meaning
of my text and amplified parts of it. Without the ‘fixes’ that post-production
offers as well my final product would have been far less impressive to any
audience.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)